AI Socratic evaluation for higher education
Orazio runs adaptive oral-style dialogues with students, evaluates their reasoning using standard rubric dimensions, and gives professors and faculties evidence they can trust.
The challenge isn't content. It's verifying understanding.
Generative models have made content production trivially easy. Students can generate essays, reports, and presentations in seconds. Traditional assessments, designed for a pre-AI world, were never meant to distinguish genuine reasoning from generated output.
Higher education needs evaluation methods that preserve depth, integrity, and genuine learning.
Adaptive Socratic dialogue
Guided questions that probe reasoning depth instead of passive recall.
Rubric-based evaluation
Each answer is evaluated on standard dimensions used across higher-education.
Evidence for professors and faculties
Learning Objective insights for courses; Learning Goal data for program-wide AoL.
Built for two audiences
Course-level evaluation for professors. Program-level evidence for faculties.
For Professors
Support oral exams, case discussions, and qualitative assessments with rigorous, rubric-based evaluation.
For Program Directors & Faculty
Produce program-level learning evidence aligned with your accreditation framework.
How it works
A structured process that maintains academic rigor while leveraging adaptive evaluation.
Faculty defines the framework
Course materials, learning objectives, and rubric dimensions set the boundaries
Students reason aloud
A guided Socratic conversation reveals their understanding
Orazio evaluates reasoning
Using standard rubric criteria trusted across higher education
Evidence is delivered
Course-level feedback for professors; program-level AoL for faculties
Academic control and transparency
The professor stays in control. Orazio operates within your academic framework.
Grounded in your course materials
Orazio only references materials and frameworks you provide
Aligned with your learning objectives
Orazio evaluates student reasoning using the learning objectives defined in your course.
Full transparency
All outputs are interpretable and auditable by faculty
Built on academic standards
Grounded in established higher-education pedagogy and assessment.
Evidence-based approach
Grounded in research on Socratic questioning and oral assessment.
Accreditation alignment
Designed to meet AACSB and EQUIS accreditation requirements.
Consistent evaluation criteria
Uses transversal rubric dimensions to ensure rigor across students and courses.
See Orazio on a real assignment
Request a sample evaluation and we’ll walk you through how Orazio works on your own course materials.